Hi-Jack over at MPCClub is not always correct about everything he says about Xtreamer products-in this case, and with this issue, he was dead right, and he was the first to "break this news" even at the time when Xtreamer was not even fully aware, or were just becoming aware of this issue. That would not have been a good PR or good business move.Īnyway, I do not speak for the company and those are just my personal opinions and impressions. Why would a company that has BIG plans, and keeps rolling out new products pull a stunt like that? Of course they would know that the backlash would be bad, and paint the company in a bad light. Of course, once they found out this could not happen on the original model, there was a bit of scrambling-and some would say (maybe rightly so) that they did not handle the PR of this in the best manner.īut from where I stand, I can honestly say, on Xtreamer's part, when that feature was being promised in the beginning, it was being promised in "good faith" with the full intention to fulfill that promise-it's wasn't some grand master plan or scheme to deceive customers. I know for a fact, that there was a time Xtreamer was pushing hard to get the licenses in place to be able to add this feature to the original model (as advertised and promised). Ryan) were all caught off-guard by the Realtek issue that prevents HD audio bitstreaming in the original Xtreamer model. I can only tell you what I have been told and what I have read online.įrom everything that I have gathered, Xtreamer (and the other companies with players based on Realtek chipsets like A.C. Originally Posted by Xtreamer USA /forum/post/18943574
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |